Ideas That Influence My Vote...and Should Influence Yours
I am writing this to Christians, not
nominal Christmas and Easter types, but genuine,
humbled-by-their-own-sins, gracious, trying hard to love their most
annoying neighbors, Christ-followers. Of course, any interested
person can read this, but I'm not interested in a flood of nasty
comments that I will simply delete. I don't really want to argue
with anyone either. I will happily read kind, thoughtful,
well-reasoned responses, meaning you've read this carefully and you
have something appropriate to say. I am a Christian, imperfect but
God is working on me in his holy patience, and I expect the same from
my critics and friends (if there is a difference). I make a fair
number of assertions without providing citations; I will add them if
there is sufficient interest.
The founding and creation of the United
States was a divinely guided miracle. Does that make us a Christian
nation? Given all the precautions to prevent religious autocracy, I
don't think so, at least not as most people might imagine it. The
miracle was a nation with religious freedom; in particular,
Christian freedom was preserved and protected. The founders were
well-read, thoughtful, highly insightful believers, for the most
part; what they sought to do was prevent what happened in England and
Europe during and after the Reformation. To this day, Christian
believers don't know how or, perhaps more importantly, don't care to
live in unity. The perennial problem is the desire for those who
believe they're right to dominate or eliminate those they believe to
be wrong, clearly contrary to the teaching of Christ. The result
today is a divided Church into enclaves of bickering believers; the
problem in the past was bloodier, a past as recent as Ireland and
Lebanon.
The end result was neither a king nor a
pope, definitely not a divinely appointed monarch, not here anyway.
The goal was to choose short-term citizen-leaders to serve to
represent their people from communities, states, and the nation as a
whole. Their power was limited to tasks specifically named, with an
amendment added (the Tenth) to emphasize that, what was not spelled
out was not the business of the federal government, with most left
ultimately to the people. This was the genius of individual freedom
written into our founding documents, a freedom that simultaneously
preserved religious liberty. This also effectively ended the
nobility class and created the first real equality, one that we have
struggled to broaden and improve over the decades. With freedom came
the opportunity to devise or choose ways to make a living, what we
call capitalism, largely unrestricted by the government. That's how
it was, but our government has been busy interfering with both
freedom and capitalism.
Some of the founders were outspoken in
their belief in the Christian faith and the need for virtuous
leaders. Let's be honest however. None of us is fit for the task;
we are all, every single one of us, sinners, made righteous, not by
our own moral virtue but by divine declaration based on the
sacrificial work of Christ. The warning: judge not unless you want
to be judged in exactly the same way. Ouch! We all have plenty to
hide, and I for one prefer not to have my willful, persistent
failings exposed. Our judgment is far from fair; we cut ourselves
plenty of leeway while we harshly pointing the finger at others (You
know, that whole splinter/log business). We are especially hard on
leaders, and the political class uses this to gain an advantage,
often with Christians following blindly along like the sheep they
are. Those who have worked diligently over the past 50 years or more
to undermine the moral and spiritual underpinnings of our nation
hypocritically attack their political adversaries, and many of us
follow these phony angels of light.
Enter the world of 24/7 media exposure
and the politics of personal destruction. Let me be perfectly clear.
I will be voting for the candidate(s) who seem most likely to
preserve and restore our security and Constitutional freedoms, and I
don't mean security at the expense of the Constitution! I am sick of
the collusion of the Left, the Democratic Party, and the mainstream
media to destroy their rivals. The will dig up whatever dirt they
can or make it up when they cannot find any. Many on their “side”
are blatantly immoral and dishonest without difficulty, because they
largely reject traditional morality, and have for quite some time.
On the other side, those caught in “sin” frequently disappear
into obscurity because we, the righteous, holy judges of morality,
help drive them there. Is it any wonder our nation has become a
moral cesspool? We have largely abandoned the gospel of forgiveness
and substituted righteous indignation and arrogant pride. Given the
choice, who wouldn't choose the libertine option?
You know what I think. I think we
cannot restore sexual virtue without the Great Commandment. Do you
recall the first three verses of I Corinthians 13? Anything done for
God without love is
pointless, useless, and empty. Is sex dirty? No! Sex without
genuine love, however, is empty. I believe Christians are too
focused on the nasty, gossipy bits. We kind of like them, even as we
seem to reject them (Ever been to an old time tent meeting and heard
the public confessions? Gross!). The repugnant things our leaders
do—and let's be honest here, many of them do—are a reflection of
us, our culture, the culture Christians have largely abandoned rather
than engaged to redeem. Most people with a bit of maturity, I
believe, would prefer sexual virtue tied to love and faithfulness.
Is condemnation the way to help them find it? How many of us are
doing anything else to help them discover that the moral purity we
promote and claim is better?
So, in this democratic republic, the
task for a believer is to find the most righteous, virtuous
candidate, right? Never mind that he or she will never be elected
(We just don't have enough moralists voting!). At least we can feel
more self-righteous for doing so. Then we can spend the next 4 or 8
years decrying the state of things but proudly asserting it wasn't
our choice and therefore not our fault! Well, I am not convinced!
For the last 50 years of my adult life,
I have been listening to the predictions of the end times. I have
never felt we were at the threshold, although I know God is in charge
of the timetable. He clearly tells us not to try to figure it out or
use it as a justification for withdrawal. As I've often said, we
must bail water and save as many as possible, whether the boat is
doomed or not. Today I feel I must add that we should not be acting
like we're on a pleasure cruise either, especially when it's a cruise
on a cesspool! It is not our job to “bring on” the devastation
of the end times nor to pretend they will never come. What that
means is we are to engage with our neighbors to love them, encourage
them, forgive them, care for them, and show them what a real, loving,
forgiving, grace-filled Christian looks like. So trust me, it is NOT
that crap many of us spew on Facebook or wherever! What would Jesus
do? Well, he most likely would do what he did under the authority of
Caesar, who was certainly not a virtuous believer (Remember, his
harshest words and actions were for the religious leaders, not the
civic ones).
David was a man after God's own heart.
Yikes! You mean the guy who arranged the death of his loyal soldier
to cover up his sexual affair with his soldier's wife? Yeah, him!
God sent a prophet to confront him and straighten him out, yet he
still paid the price for his sins; he reaped (as did his family and
people) what he had sown. I appreciate Ben Carson; he may be that
prophet as far as Mr. Trump is concerned. If he was as terrible as
so many Christians want to say, he wouldn't have brought Carson into
his team. It disappoints me how willing so many are to let the
attackers from the Left have their way. Look back. They did the
same crap with every Republican candidate as far back as Reagan. Our
side listens, and our candidates lose. One thing I appreciate about
Mr. Trump is his ability to hold his own against all that, the first
ever to do so. Yeah, I wish he was a bit more discrete, but usually
holding back ends in defeat.
I confess to a struggle at this point.
I have nothing good to say about Mrs. Clinton. I don't find the two
candidates the least bit comparable. The only reason she is not in
jail is her friends in high places. I expect some day her full story
will be told, and it will be awful. That said, I should pray for her
just as I believe we should pray for him (Trump although Mr. Clinton
surely needs it, too). One difference, though, is he has people he
respects around him. He apologized for this latest revelation. She
just doubles down with the same lies and excuses.
All that said, and it should matter to
us as believers, I don't want what Mrs. Clinton offers. Hers is a
path of destruction, of further loss of freedom, of anti-faith, of
more of what we have suffered for the past 8 years. Mr. Trump is far
from perfect, but he is even farther from her agenda. A substantial
majority of us believe we're headed in the wrong direction. Our
national debt is, to use a popular word, unsustainable. Our
immigration policies are nuts; I see it first hand as a tutor for
refugees, recent immigrants, and international students. The
destructive policies of Europe will lead to destruction here as well,
and for what good? Government corruption is disgusting, a direct
consequence of a federal and even state and city governments being
too large, with too much taxpayer money, and too little
accountability. She would spend more, expand Obamacare, bring more
refugees, offer more expensive government programs (the better to buy
votes, of course!). She would certainly appoint Leftist,
anti-Constitutional, anti-Bill of Rights justices to the Supreme
Court. Supporting her as a concession to the inevitable end times is
foolish, as we don't know the timetable. Allowing her to gain power
to make a statement about Trump's moral failings makes no sense to me
whatever. Will we Christians thereby demonstrate the great goodness
of Biblical morality? This is not the place for that.
As for Mr. Trump, though he is far
removed from my ideal of restoration of liberty, constitutionalism,
and small government, has very specific plans in that direction. I
am not a racist; you only need to see with whom I spend my time to
know that. I don't believe he is a racist either. He does believe
in lower immigration and secure borders. He believes in tax policies
that encourage business growth and, thereby, higher employment. He
would likely reduce regulation which strangles business, especially
small business which is so important. He would work to replace
Obamacare, which is clearly a mess; nationalized medical care may
work for a small country, but it simply encourages bloated
bureaucracy and corruption in a large nation such as ours. We must
stop using more government to solve problems caused by more
government! He has promised to appoint constitutionalist justices
with the hope of restoring our “nation of laws.”
You know what makes me sad? It makes
me sad that the best we Christians seem to be able to do to “stand
for Christ” is vote against Donald Trump. Are you serious? Oh,
you'll get lots of agreement from groups on the Left—feminists,
LGBT, illegal immigrants, political elitists who want to preserve the
status quo, etc.—but they will assume you've joined them. Stand
for Christ? The Clinton's political strategy is to humiliate Trump
and drive away his support, but their intentions are far from holy,
good for the Church, or even good for the country. They show every
indication of desiring only power and wealth, to be the first woman
President, and to advance a far Left agenda. And you will take pride
in voting against Trump and giving Hillary what she wants...for
Christ??
I have long been intrigued by the
tension under which we American Christians live. The Bible plainly
says God appoints secular governments to preserve order and restrain
Satan, yet in the United States we get to help choose our leaders.
As always, when considering providence, one wonders how that works.
In the story of Joseph, we learn that God used for good the evil plan
his brothers carried out. Yet, he commands us to love our neighbors,
says we don't really love him if we don't love them, explains to us
that the world will recognize us because we love each other like he
loves us, says the we'll be called God's children if we are
peacemakers (not troublemakers nor angry critics nor arrogant
so-and-sos). It is my profound hope that those, who know, are
involved with, and see me, see that which makes me a credible witness
for the love of Jesus Christ because his love is evident in me. I'll
leave the confusion of providence for him to explain when I'm better
able to understand.
As for my vote, I will vote for the one
who seems most likely to work to restrain evil and to preserve and
restore the founders' vision of the United States. My vote will not
be an endorsement of anyone's sin, since all are guilty, certainly in
the past and, if we're honest, continuing into the present. I will
pray for both/all candidates, believing he can break through to a
heart not fully hardened against him. I will stand against the
cynical manipulation of Christians by the Left, recognizing them for
their hypocrisy, since they generally stand against Biblical morality
and spirituality. I will hope and work for a Church, for believers,
who care about their influence at times other than election seasons
(although they do seem endless). I don't men political influence,
which is virtually nothing. Rather I mean personal influence, living
the love of Jesus so the unbelievers are drawn to him, his love, his
forgiveness, his rebirth, his glorious, abundant life.
Comments